My MG ZS EV Test Drive

On Saturday I had the chance to take my family for a test drive in the new electric version of MG’s ZS.

While the name MG (‘Morris Garages’) has a lot of history, particularly in connection with sports cars, the current MG Motors is a Chinese brand. They have had some success in the budget end of the UK market, but have made waves with the new EV version of their ZS crossover. It has a good enough range (about 160 miles) at a low enough price (in the £21k to £28k range) to make people sit up and take notice.

MG ZS EV (Image: T. Larkum)

MG ZS EV (Image: T. Larkum)

I’m not going to go into great detail on the car specs, how it handles, etc. (for some of that, see our MG ZS news and reviews page). Instead I’ll give a summary of our impressions:

  1. It looks good close-up, in a typical SUV way. That’s to say, if you take the badge off one SUV it could be almost any other SUV on the road. But in this context, with a low price example of the breed, that’s a great result. We’d be happy to have one on our drive.
  2. It drives well enough, absorbing most though not all of the roads’ bumps. It accelerates well, though it was very quick to wheelspin when I tried it a couple of times in Sport mode (though, to be fair, it was raining the whole time).
  3. It felt spacious, particularly in the back. There was a noticeable gap between the knees of the rear passengers and the backs of the front seats. Conversely, the middle rear seat was very narrow – it would only suffice for a child, and then only without a car seat.
  4. The multimedia console was pretty good – a touchscreen with satnav, handsfree phone, music, etc. The satnav had a noticeable lag the first time it loads but after that it seemed pretty responsive. It is compatible with both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
  5. The boot was a decent size (something lacking in my current BMW i3!) even with the charging cables stored underneath. It had quite a big lip, but this could be reduced by raising the boot floor to a higher point when it was also nearly level with the back seats when folded forward and so giving a very large usable space overall. The seats don’t fold completely flat though.
  6. We test drove the top-of-the-range Exclusive version which had lots of nice extras that we appreciated such as a panoramic sunroof, electrically adjustable seats, roof rails, leather seats and rear parking camera.
MG ZS EV (Image: T. Larkum)

MG ZS EV (Image: T. Larkum)

Overall we were impressed with the car, particularly at the suggested price (equivalent to about £360 per month for the Exclusive with a £1500 trade in). Definitely one to consider if you’re in the market for a medium range EV at at good price.

It’s Time to Go Green!

If you would like to know more about Solar Panels and the PowerBanx range of home battery systems, and get a free instant quote, please complete our online form:

Comments (2)

  1. Reply

    Regarding the rear seat. I test drove last week, whole family in tow. Partner and 2 kids, as I’m not a vlogger or site owner I was accompanied by the salesman (how hard is it to get an on your tod test drive).

    So in back I had 2 kids in full booster seats and my partner in the middle seat. She wasn’t uncomfortable, narrow hipped I guess, but not much shoulder room (which you’d expect with 2 bit winged booster seats).

    I noticed the front seats are nicely firm, the rear seats are much softer, but not too soft. The fake pleather felt pretty nice I thought. Heater worked well, no steamy windows. Loads of rear room as you said, I’m 6ft and after the drive I set the seat back as far as I comfortably could (further than normal) and there was still loads of room for me in the back, knees no where near the front backrest.

    Plenty of storage cubbies too.

  2. Trevor Larkum

    Reply

    Sandy, I agree with your comments. My wife did a drive accompanied but then I was able to take it back out unaccompanied (this was at Leicester). I’m impressed you got 3 people across the back seat.

    Overall it was a good package, but given its low cash price I was a bit disappointed in the PCP price – I think they’re assuming very high depreciation.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: