ELECTRIC cars are on average more cost effective than petrol and diesel vehicles, according to a new study.

It found that over a seven-year period of owning a car, electric vehicles such as the Nissan Leaf, Volkswagen ID and the MG ZS EV are more cost effective than internal combustion engine equivalents. This is due to lower annual running costs, according to the LV= ‘Electric Car Cost Index’.

The ‘Electric Car Cost Index’ explores purchase price, tax, insurance, fuel and maintenance costs for nine electric cars vs their petrol/diesel equivalent to establish the total cost of ownership.

According to the Index, savings driven by average annual running costs were around 49 percent or £1,306 cheaper than petrol and diesel cars.

Seven out of nine electric cars evaluated offer better value over a four-year lease, including the Kia e-Niro, the Nissan Leaf and the Volkswagen e-UP.

The largest saving over a four-year lease is the Nissan Leaf compared to the Ford Focus ecoboost, which sees over £7,000 in savings.

Despite its popularity, the Tesla Model 3 would actually be more expensive to run over four years in comparison to the BMW 320i, with losses of £741.

Alex Borgnis, Head of Motor Underwriting at LV= General Insurance, commented: “With this new Electric Car Cost Index we’re really trying to show, in the most comprehensive way, how the costs breakdown for people considering taking the plunge and making an electric model their next car.

“While the initial purchase will seem intimidating for some, once you break down the monthly costs, especially on a lease or PCP, and then throw in the lower running costs each year, suddenly it becomes something that provides great value over the course of the ownership period.

“You really don’t need to remortgage to get yourself on the electric car ladder.”

The savings on electric cars are heavily driven by lower average annual running costs – £1,304 compared to £2,610 for a petrol or diesel car.

This means that electric car drivers save an average of £109 a month, with savings extending further as they require less maintenance and have a longer life span.

For cars compared over a seven-year ownership, drivers could save more than £13,000 with an MG ZS EV rather than a Seat Ateca.

However, big losses can also be made on electric cars with a £8,105 loss when comparing the Renault Zoe GT Line and the Renault Clio.

Dr Euan McTurk, Consultant Battery Electrochemist at Plug Life Consulting spoke of his own experiences and savings when using an electric car.

He said: “Having driven electric cars for the past ten years, these results are not in the least bit surprising.

“My own electric car saves me £800 per year in fuel, tax and maintenance vs even the most efficient hybrid on the road.

“Comparing it to an equivalent, 5-seater family car, that saving is nearer £1,300 per year.

Read more: Express

It’s Time to Go Green!

If you would like to know more about Solar Panels and the PowerBanx range of home battery systems, and get a free instant quote, please complete our online form:

Some electric vehicles (EVs) are cheaper over a seven year-period than a petrol or diesel alternative, according to research conducted by LV General Insurance.

The researchers examined the purchase, financing and running costs for nine popular EV models and their petrol and diesel equivalents.

They found that three of the nine EVs: Nissan Leaf, WV ID3 and MG ZS EV were cheaper.

The MG ZS EV had the biggest long-term savings – £13,316 on outright purchase over seven years, £5,772 via a standard lease agreement over four years and £2,320 via a standard PCP arrangement over three years.

The savings on EVs is heavily driven by lower annual running costs. With EV drivers saving an average of £109 per month.

Additionally, with electric cars traditionally having a longer life span and requiring less maintenance, the savings can be even bigger.

Read more: airqualitynews.com

It’s Time to Go Green!

If you would like to know more about Solar Panels and the PowerBanx range of home battery systems, and get a free instant quote, please complete our online form:

Rachel Maclean, Minister for the Future of Transport and Decarbonisation, has dropped a fresh hint that the Government intents to scrap grants to help drivers buy expensive electric vehicles.

With the ban on sales of new petrol and diesel cars just eight-and-a-half years away, driver purchases are soon to be limited to battery-powered models only.

The high price of electric models remains one of the key stumbling blocks preventing motorists buying them in larger numbers today.

However, despite this, the Government in March slashed the Plug-in Car Grant, reducing both the subsidy amount by £500 to £2,500 and eligibility for only models priced up to £35,000 when it had previous been available for those up to £50,000.

In a recent interview with Autocar, Mclean defended the decision to reduce the grant – and said its availability would be kept under under review.

The grant was first launched in 2011 and offered up to £5,000 off the price of new plug-in vehicles.

In the prevailing decade, the grant amount and qualifying vehicle types has been frequently adjusted, with the latest changes coming just months ago.

The move was lambasted by industry insiders and vehicle manufacturers at the time, with Mike Hawes, chief executive at the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, described the decision as the ‘wrong move at the wrong time’.

He said the government had risked putting the UK ‘even further behind other markets’ in terms of vehicle supply and said it sent the ‘wrong message’ to consumers’ who might have been considering buying a greener vehicle.

Ford of Britain chairman, Graham Hoare, said it was a ‘disappointing’ step that was ‘not conducive to supporting the zero emissions future we all desire’ while RAC head of roads policy Nicholas Lyes criticised MPs for making a decision that risked ‘people holding onto their older, more polluting vehicles for longer’.

However, Maclean, speaking exclusively to Autocar magazine, defended the actions.

She said it was right for the Government to target grants only towards lower-priced electric vehicles because ‘that’s where people are less likely to be able to fund the cost out of their own pocket entirely’.

The move means that not a single Tesla vehicle qualifies for the scheme, nor does Ford’s new Mustang Mach-e, which is priced from £40,270 in the UK.

In fact, fewer than 30 electric cars on sale today now qualify for the scheme – you can find out which ones are eligible in our full report.

In the interview, Maclean also hinted that the days of the grant could be numbered, with the prospect of the incentive being scrapped completely.

The Government’s Road to Zero strategy in 2018 first stated that as the market became ‘better established and more competitive, the need for direct government financial support will decrease’.

It added: ‘We therefore expect to deliver a managed exit from the grant in due course and to continue to support the uptake of ultra low emission vehicles through other measures.’

Maclean – who owns an electric Jaguar i-Pace, which costs £65,000 and has never been eligible for the plug-in car grant – reiterated that statement to Autocar, saying: ‘I think it’s right to keep on looking at that [the future of the scheme], because ultimately we need to make sure we’re not using government money to help people buy cars who could have afforded them anyway.

‘One of our concerns is to make this an equitable transition for everyone, and of course at the moment electric cars are a bit more expensive – although if you factor in the overall cost of ownership, they will be on a parity soon.’

The Department for Transport referred us to their plug-in car grant delivery plan when we approached the government agency for comment.

The plan says: ‘We have been clear since 2018 that we intend to reduce the plug-in car grant over time.’

It adds a final commitment statement, saying: ‘We will continue to fund the plug-in car grant until at least 2022/23.’

Hydrogen and synthetic fuels will play a part to decarbonise transport – but NOT for passenger cars
In the interview, Maclean also suggested that hydrogen and synthetic e-fuels will play a part in decarbonising transport, but they will more likely be adopted for other vehicle types away from passenger cars.

‘The truth about hydrogen is that it’s very expensive to produce,’ the transport minister explained.

She added that the government will produce a hydrogen strategy very soon, but suggested it would be for decarbonising other vehicle types, including heavy goods vehicles, planes and ships.

Maclean added that synthetic fuels, like Porsche’s e-Fuel currently being developed in Chile, will also have ‘a role to play’ in driving down emissions, but explained it would more likely be used for the aviation and maritime industry.

Read more: This Is Money

It’s Time to Go Green!

If you would like to know more about Solar Panels and the PowerBanx range of home battery systems, and get a free instant quote, please complete our online form: